Posts Tagged Education

A few thoughts on that bullying video

I’m sure most of us have seen that video, of a bullied overweight boy finally snapping after a few punches in the face and slamming his aggressor into the ground. It wasn’t hard to give into your base emotions and feel that as violent and disproportionate the retaliation was, the little shit got what was coming to him. It was ugly, brutal, violent and we felt bad for getting so any enjoyment from the video.

I’d guess for me, like many others it was a brutal reminder of the often violent world of high school that we banished to the back of our minds as soon as we graduated. I’d say more than a few of us have been in Casey’s position and remember all too well a system that was unsympathetic to bullying victims and made many fearful to speak out.

Just what message does it send to children that both of the kids received the same punishment of four days suspension? Sure, it wasn’t ideal for the bullied child to retaliate with violence, but it was the school that failed in its duty of care by allowing such violence to go unchallenged on their grounds. The victim should not be punished because the system had failed to protect him. Its behaviour like this that makes children at school reluctant to speak out about being a victim of violence. Because if the school decides that violence in self-defence is just as bad as being a violent aggressor then children become wary that asking for help might just result in them being punished.

John Birmingham is right to point out that amongst all our cheering, we are lucky that Casey’s bodyslam didn’t result in a serious injury or even death. Penbo over at the punch goes off onto a wild tangent (not to mention calling the victim “Fat Kid” 9 times) comparing the video to the notorious Bumfights videos in the USA. The difference being that the internet and camera phones isn’t encouraging violence that wasn’t happening before, but its showing and reminding adults and education bureaucrats just how violent and horrible school is for many many children in a way they cant ignore it. The violence in the video is nothing new, but before the internet it was violence that adults rarely saw.

From news reports it seems like the parents of both of the children need a prompt wake up call. Casey’s father said ”He’s always been taught never to hit. Apparently other people’s parents don’t teach their kids that.” sounds like as idealistic way to teach your kid humanist values, but telling your kid to sit there like a punching bag isn’t going to solve anything or stop the violence. Likewise the bullies mother had a hard time believing that her little angel could be the tiny tormentor in the video clip. If anything is achieved from all this, lets hope that it forces parents and teachers to confront the living hell some kids endure at school and the system that stops them from speaking out.

Its sending a terrible message that a victim of years of bullying and violence is being punished by the school that clearly failed to protect him from violence for so many years.

Tags: , ,

A few thoughts on that bullying video

I’m sure most of us have seen that video, of a bullied overweight boy finally snapping after a few punches in the face and slamming his aggressor into the ground. It wasn’t hard to give into your base emotions and feel that as violent and disproportionate the retaliation was, the little shit got what was coming to him. It was ugly, brutal, violent and we felt bad for getting so any enjoyment from the video.

I’d guess for me, like many others it was a brutal reminder of the often violent world of high school that we banished to the back of our minds as soon as we graduated. I’d say more than a few of us have been in Casey’s position and remember all too well a system that was unsympathetic to bullying victims and made many fearful to speak out.

Just what message does it send to children that both of the kids received the same punishment of four days suspension? Sure, it wasn’t ideal for the bullied child to retaliate with violence, but it was the school that failed in its duty of care by allowing such violence to go unchallenged on their grounds. The victim should not be punished because the system had failed to protect him. Its behaviour like this that makes children at school reluctant to speak out about being a victim of violence. Because if the school decides that violence in self-defence is just as bad as being a violent aggressor then children become wary that asking for help might just result in them being punished.

John Birmingham is right to point out that amongst all our cheering, we are lucky that Casey’s bodyslam didn’t result in a serious injury or even death. Penbo over at the punch goes off onto a wild tangent (not to mention calling the victim “Fat Kid” 9 times) comparing the video to the notorious Bumfights videos in the USA. The difference being that the internet and camera phones isn’t encouraging violence that wasn’t happening before, but its showing and reminding adults and education bureaucrats just how violent and horrible school is for many many children in a way they cant ignore it. The violence in the video is nothing new, but before the internet it was violence that adults rarely saw.

From news reports it seems like the parents of both of the children need a prompt wake up call. Casey’s father said “He’s always been taught never to hit. Apparently other people’s parents don’t teach their kids that.” sounds like as idealistic way to teach your kid humanist values, but telling your kid to sit there like a punching bag isn’t going to solve anything or stop the violence. Likewise the bullies mother had a hard time believing that her little angel could be the tiny tormentor in the video clip. If anything is achieved from all this, lets hope that it forces parents and teachers to confront the living hell some kids endure at school and the system that stops them from speaking out.

Its sending a terrible message that a victim of years of bullying and violence is being punished by the school that clearly failed to protect him from violence for so many years.

Tags: , ,

A few thoughts on that bullying video

I’m sure most of us have seen that video, of a bullied overweight boy finally snapping after a few punches in the face and slamming his aggressor into the ground. It wasn’t hard to give into your base emotions and feel that as violent and disproportionate the retaliation was, the little shit got what was coming to him. It was ugly, brutal, violent and we felt bad for getting so any enjoyment from the video.

I’d guess for me, like many others it was a brutal reminder of the often violent world of high school that we banished to the back of our minds as soon as we graduated. I’d say more than a few of us have been in Casey’s position and remember all too well a system that was unsympathetic to bullying victims and made many fearful to speak out.

Just what message does it send to children that both of the kids received the same punishment of four days suspension? Sure, it wasn’t ideal for the bullied child to retaliate with violence, but it was the school that failed in its duty of care by allowing such violence to go unchallenged on their grounds. The victim should not be punished because the system had failed to protect him. Its behaviour like this that makes children at school reluctant to speak out about being a victim of violence. Because if the school decides that violence in self-defence is just as bad as being a violent aggressor then children become wary that asking for help might just result in them being punished.

John Birmingham is right to point out that amongst all our cheering, we are lucky that Casey’s bodyslam didn’t result in a serious injury or even death. Penbo over at the punch goes off onto a wild tangent (not to mention calling the victim “Fat Kid” 9 times) comparing the video to the notorious Bumfights videos in the USA. The difference being that the internet and camera phones isn’t encouraging violence that wasn’t happening before, but its showing and reminding adults and education bureaucrats just how violent and horrible school is for many many children in a way they cant ignore it. The violence in the video is nothing new, but before the internet it was violence that adults rarely saw.

From news reports it seems like the parents of both of the children need a prompt wake up call. Casey’s father said “He’s always been taught never to hit. Apparently other people’s parents don’t teach their kids that.” sounds like as idealistic way to teach your kid humanist values, but telling your kid to sit there like a punching bag isn’t going to solve anything or stop the violence. Likewise the bullies mother had a hard time believing that her little angel could be the tiny tormentor in the video clip. If anything is achieved from all this, lets hope that it forces parents and teachers to confront the living hell some kids endure at school and the system that stops them from speaking out.

Its sending a terrible message that a victim of years of bullying and violence is being punished by the school that clearly failed to protect him from violence for so many years.

Tags: , ,

Bad reporting or deliberate class provocation?

Yesterday Tony Abbott declared the Coalition would expand the existing Education Tax Rebate to include school fees for all eligible students.

According to the Liberal Party’s press release:

“For primary students, this would mean a rebate to up to $500 per year per child in primary school. Eligible families will be able to claim a 50 per cent rebate for up to $1,000 of eligible education-related expenses for each child in primary school.

“For secondary school students, we will increase the rebate to up to $1,000 per year per child. Eligible families will be able to claim a 50 per cent rebate for up to $2,000 of education-related expenses for each child in secondary school.”

The payment is available for students at state, independent and private schools. But the government school element of this seems to have been lost on the Fairfax press, which ran with this intro:

Parents will be entitled to claim generous fee subsidies for sending their children to private and independent schools as part of the Coalition’s expanded education rebate policy.

Nowhere in the story that follows does it mention that state school students are eligible for the tax rebate, or that it is only available to parents on Family Tax Benefit A – meaning it’s already Centrelink means tested. In fact at the end of the story there is a poll which asks:

Do you think students should be able to claim a rebate on private school fees?

Which is shorthand for, should rich parents be allowed to claim tax benefits for sending their kid to Scotch College?

The Australian got into the act as well, with:

PARENTS will be able to claim for private school fees, violin lessons and dance and drama classes under the Coalition’s education tax rebate.

Do you like the addition of violin in there?

It’s true government schools don’t have fees, but they do have voluntary levies (in Victoria at least) which parents are strongly “encouraged” to pay. There have been cases of schools threatening to withhold extra-curricular services from children, such as excursions and sports carnivals subsidised by the levy, if parents don’t pay up. These levies are generally under $100 for primary school and under $200 for secondary schools, and are on top of the cost of books, uniforms, camps, shoes etc. The notion of free government schooling is virtually a myth.

Now I am the last person to defend private schools (or Liberal Party policy for that matter). However, stories on election announcements should be accurate, informative and totally objective without a sensationalist angle. If ever a journalist’s primary role of gathering information, assessing it and presenting it in an easy to digest and accurate manner was important it’s during an election campaign. Why skew a story for a decent headline when offering people tax breaks for school fees is interesting enough?

Of course, it is debatable whether or not there should be tax rebates for private school fees, but there’s a big difference between including private schools in such a scheme and it being exclusive public schools when it comes to people’s opinions on the matter.

For the record I’m sick of middle class welfare for cost of living expenses such as school fees when family carers of disabled children are doing it touch because they are unable to work and often receive less than the aged pension.

Tags: , , , , , ,