Archive for category Social etiquette

Extra-judicial killing? Give me a break

As soon as the news broke that FBI’s most wanted terrorist and Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden had been killed by a Navy Seals team in a black ops mission in Pakistan, there was a predictable cry of “extra-judicial killing” from ethicists and progressives over twitter.

Sure, in a perfect world, once the US had reliable intelligence as to bin Laden’s location they would have worked in co-operation with Pakistan, captured him alive and then tried him in a court. But the US had no idea if bin Laden was being protected by elements of the Pakistani military or government so it is likely that if they did try to do this in co-operation with Pakistan, Osama would have been tipped off and they would have lost their chance. They had their chance and they couldn’t risk it by informing Pakistan before that mission was completed.

Was it a death squad? Well Obama was given the option of targeting the compound  with a precision bombing but he rejected this and went for the harder and riskier option to avoid unnecessary casualties. He decided to put his Navy Seals life at risk for the tougher, riskier but braver option specifically to avoid casualties, this deserves praise. I think most people find it reasonable that lethal force is allowed to be used if the target is putting other lives in danger, resisting arrest or fighting back. From reports so far, bin Laden ticked all three of these boxes so I don’t think “secret death squad” or murder is an accurate description. Bin Laden decided his fate when he fought back and refused to go peacefully.

I don’t see this as hypocritical that opponents of the death penalty are welcoming the death. Rules of engagement for military and police to use lethal force once certain criteria are met, and although this mission falls into what could best be described as an international law grey area I don’t think we would be tut-tutting police or military who used similar force in a police raid or in a warzone.

As for the criticism of the spontaneous celebrations in front of the White House and in New York, sure it did look a bit tacky and in poor taste but I can’t be angry at them. Osama bin Laden’s terrorist group was the reason for the invasion of Afghanistan almost ten years ago, a war America and us have been involved in for longer than the second world war. The terrorist attack was the most deadly on US soil in its history. As the current military engagements have lacked the clear victories of older wars, this was a clearer definitive moment of success for America. Is it tacky to celebrate a death? Sure, but were the celebrations in cities once victory was declared in Europe also not celebrating the death of the enemies that resulted in that victory? I don’t see how celebrating the death of the person who was the reason behind the war in Afghanistan is that bad a thing.

Leslie Cannold compared the celebrations to those celebrating 9/11

If we found Arab street repellent when they celebrated 9/11, and I definitely did, how do we justify our celebrations now?#osamadead
Really? I think I can tell the difference between cheering  at an attack that left some 3000 odd civilians to die a pretty horrible death and cheering the death of the cause of that atrocity in a firefight? I’m no ethicist, but there is a pretty clear difference to me.

Debate will rage about how much or if bin Laden’s death matters in the long term, but overall I have no problem with people being happy and celebrating it. I say Navy Seals team and Obama who gave the order, well done.

Tags: , ,

How to write an open letter

Dear Recipient,

This is the bit where I introduce myself, try to play down the formality and kind of make out we’re friends despite the fact I don’t know you personally and this letter is actually a passive-aggressive way to criticise you in front of everyone who’ll read this. I could have sent you a personal message, but then no one would know I’m doing this. In the end it’s all about me.

Now I’ll offer up my credentials to give this exercise some credibility and to show what has driven me to write this letter. Anyone can complain about your actions but I have X amount of exposure to this issue and the poor people who will suffer from your decision. I’m doing this for them after all.

Despite what I just wrote in the previous paragraph I’ll play down my credentials a little so I don’t seem as bigheaded as I am. I’ll even crack a self-depreciating joke to acknowledge we’re not all perfect, but have good intentions at heart.

Aha, caught you off guard! Now I go for the kill and tell you why you’re wrong.

  • This is now
  • A good time
  • To put my objections
  • In point form.

Now I’ve made a fool of you, I’ll try reasoning by pointing out that “as you can see” all my points are right. I’ll pretend to think you’re indeed a reasonable person and that you had no idea of the repercussions of your decision until I wrote this open letter to you. I am actually doing you and the world a big favour.

Then I’ll sign off with a subtle warning about not heeding my “advice”, and finally end this exercise with a rather insincere …

Yours Sincerely

David Bonnici

Job Title that gives me the self-authority to write this

Tags: ,

The Devine Miss M

Miranda Devine is not impressed. During last weeks episode of Qanda, Aboriginal activist Bess Price was on the panel. As the debate ventured onto the topic of the Northern Territory intervention there were a few nasty tweets from those who disagreed with her stance. One from Barrister Larissa Behrendt ruffled a few feathers when she said that a show she had seen where a man had sex with a horse was less offensive than Bess Price.

For this Miranda Devine went into moral outrage overdrive!

THE bestiality tweet by inner-city barrister Larissa Behrendt against the Northern Territory activist Bess Price, was offensive.

We should be grateful for the tweet because it gave us a rare undisguised insight into the depraved and rancid core of the reflexively leftist, inner-urban, ivory-tower thinking that infects every level of politics, in every political party, at every university, in every protected job and every comfortable suburb shielded from hardship, and immune to reality.

Wow, she got all that from a single childish tweet? As Miranda took such offence from it then surely she would never ever be caught saying something similar? Oh wait.


I guess some bestiality jokes are all classy and witty and others are an obvious sign of moral bankruptcy. It’s so hard to tell the difference between the two though.

Tags: , ,

A flaming twat

Here is a letter from today’s Sydney Morning Herald

How is it legal? My young family lives in an inner-city area in an apartment with a balcony. We recently celebrated the birth of our daughter who was welcomed home by our one-year-old son.

Not long after we got home, our upstairs neighbours lit up a cigarette on their balcony and the smoke from their cigarette drifted in through all of our bedroom windows and open balcony doors.

It frustrates me that smoking, a known health hazard is allowed in high density areas. This is particularly so when the smoker exits their apartment because they don’t want the toxic smoke to damage their property and smoke on their balcony only to have their smoke enter ours.

Over these hot summer days I’ve been opening all the windows in the hope that a cool breeze will blow through – instead every 1.5 hours we all passively smoke a cigarette, including my daughter who isn’t yet one month old.

With young children, passive smoking is linked to childhood illnesses including leukaemia and cot death. How is it possible that blowing toxic smoke in through a neighbour’s apartment is legal?

Lara Adams Chippendale

A most touching tale of family, an inspiring celebration of newborn life, and a heartfelt request for consideration and civility amidst the crowded chaos of contemporary urban life.

But, unless Ms. Adams’ upstairs neighbour is hanging upside-down over their balcony railing whilst having a puff, it behoves me to point out to the dear lady that their smoke will drift UP.

You silly, twitching little thrushbucket.

Tags: , , ,

Nintendo gets naughty

It’s a problem we have all faced. You are hosting an orgy and everyone is shy. You wonder what would be an appropriate ice-breaker in this awkward social situation. Well luckily Nintendo and Ubisoft have just the product.

One day people will be wondering just how they organised orgies pre-Nintendo.

Seriously. What. The. Fuck?

Tags: , , ,

A Day of Nontroversies

In Canberra yesterday, the opposition leader proposed cuts in expenditure as a suggestion instead of the contentious flood levy. The proposed cut that got the most attention was the scrapping of aid to Indonesia to build schools, started by the Howard government. It showed a stark and clear difference between the government and the opposition, and in my opinion highlighted Tony Abbott’s short term populism.

But if you only played normal attention to the mainstream media yesterday there were only two stories. Gillard crying in Parliament, and Abbott saying “shit happens” in Afghanistan. The first started a flurry of half-baked analysis as to whether the tears were genuine or it was a deliberate strategy. The latter was pretty much one of the worst examples of gutter journalism and showed that the only one being disrespectful about Jared McKinney’s death was Mark Riley of 7 news.

It got me thinking of Monday’s Qanda where Graham Richardson noted how Julia Gillard and politicians in general are much more controlled, scripted, safe and thus less genuine than they were 20 years ago during the Hawke government. And really, this is why they are. The “shit happens” nontroversy ended up backfiring and now Mark Riley is the one facing the criticism. But had it happened slightly differently and it did look like Abbott was disrespectful then those two words could have ended Abbott’s leadership.

We complain that they are wooden, but when every tiny mistake is analysed, when saying the wrong thing gets more criticism than their party’s policies is it any wonder they are so risk averse, scripted and boring when they speak in public? Ultimately I think we should make our decision on our politicians by their policies and what they do in government, not if they cry or not or if they say a swear word on camera.

Tags: , , ,

Gillard, Abbott, Brown. OH WHY

There is a common view that Australia is an over-governed country and it’s usually the state government that critics point to as an unnecessary tier. It’s doubtful that there are many people in Queensland with that view now. Throughout the continuous snafus that mother nature kept hurling at us, the Premier and the government has done a stellar job of keeping the public informed and managing the situation. And this is from an unpopular Premier that just a few months ago was expected to be destroyed at the next election if her own party didnt knife her first.

Compare this with the performances of the Federal leaders and I don’t think anyone would be thinking that we would be better off if Canberra was calling all the shots during the drama.

Yesterday Julia Gillard was the invisible woman. Tourists must have presumed that Anna Bligh was this nations leader if they compared the performances between the two. Whilst Anna Bligh gave hourly, informative press conferences, Gillard only popped in once that I saw and just spoke some generalities and cliches about mateship. Over-prepared and with all the sincerity of a hallmark greeting card. There was nothing particularly wrong with her performance but she lacks the empathy and common touch that Kevin Rudd and John Howard used to connect with the public during previous national tragedies. She comes off as more of an auditor in chief as she pushes her cuts and flood levy to rebuild Queensland rather than something higher that a national leader should be.

But Julia comes off pretty well compared to the woeful performance of Tony Abbott over the last few weeks. The problem with Abbott is that he is an attack dog who can’t take off his partisan hat no matter what the occasion. Tony has fine form, back when Kevin Rudd got the Labor leadership Abbott thought he would have a go at Rudd over the conflicting reports over just how long childhood Rudd spent in a car after his family was kicked off his farm. During the floods, before the peak hit Abbott thought it was a good idea to use the floods to have a go at the NBN and then after that launch a full scale assault on the flood levy. I’m not suggesting that a natural disaster means the opposition should automatically support everything the government does in response to the disaster, but Tony has clearly been more interested in using the disaster to trash the government than supporting the rebuilding and recovery.

Instead of doing the right thing and urging his supporters to give generously to the Premiers flood appeal, he pushed the line that you may as well not bother with charity as the government is gonna tax you anyway. And whilst North Queensland was bracing itself for the worst yesterday, Tony thought it a good time to ask for donations. Donations not for Queensland but for his campaign to stop a levy designed to rebuild Queensland. His entire performance can be summed up as more ass than class.

And then there is the Greens. Since Black Saturday their standard reaction to natural disasters is to try and link it to climate change. First Bob Brown comes out after being quiet during the floods and makes a spurious link between the floods and coal mining. And then yesterday Christine Milne links the cyclone to climate change. Its fair enough to say their is a link between the natural disasters and climate change, but it looks unsympathetic when that is the only thing you talk about. People who have lost everything and have seen their towns destroyed are more interested in the here and now, the rebuilding and relief rather than arguments about how much effect climate change may have on these natural disasters. It makes the Greens look like one trick ponies who aren’t all that interested in the day to day troubles of flood and cyclone victims.

They say we get the politicians we deserve, but I don’t see what we did to deserve these woeful leaders.

Tags: , ,

A crisis brings out the best and the worst

Queensland just isn’t catching a break. After the devastating floods and now the North has a category 5 cyclone.

They are now saying that it will be the worst cyclone in living memory with the potential for losses of life, not to mention the inevitable damage on the infrastructure.

And before the disaster has even hit, that reactionary talkback twerp from Melbourne, Neil Mitchell only had this to say.

So do we get ready now for a cyclone tax?

Absolute. Wanker.

No messages of support, nothing encouraging to say. All he can think about as North Queensland face a life or death situation is how much it will cost him.

Tags: , , ,

Sexy Feast

I got home from work in a filthy mood, a filthy mood totally unrelated to work (although there was one email I could’ve done without from some cheese-faced CUNT whose head I’d like to slam into a brick wall, split its eyelids with a toe-clipper and tear strips of flesh from its witheringly dusty, scabby skinned fucking body with a serrated vegetable peeler …)

I told you I was in a filthy mood.

So I get home in a filthy mood and I turn on the FUCKING TELEVISION SET!!!

There’s this Jamie Oliver show on.

Something about cooking in 30 minutes, and I thought to myself, I thought, “I can do that. You put some rice in the cooker and heat up a curry, what’s so special about that, EH?”, I thought.

“You gammy CUNT”, I thought, “I’ll fucking have you your 30 fucking minutes, I can whip up a FUCKING CARBO-FUCKING-NARA IN FUCKING FIFTEEN, you can beat that I’d like to fucking see”, I thought to my myself, I fucking thought, I fucking DID.

And then I went for a piss and came back and he was “drizzling some olive oil” on a fucking thing.

What the FUCK is a “drizzle of olive oil” ‘cause every time I see some spatula and tonged-up CUNT ON A FUCKING COOKING SHOW “drizzle some olive oil” on a fucking thing, it always looks to me like they’re throwing about three fucking cups of the stuff over whatever the fuck it is which is usually just about every fucking thing, ain’t it, EH?

EH??

That’s not a FUCKING DRIZZLE, IT’S A FUCKING SOAK, YOU DENSE FUCKING CUNTS!

I thought to myself.

A drizzle is a light, spotty precipitation which can be rather pleasant and refreshing, if we’re speaking weatherwise that is.

A fucking downpour is something altogether fucking different now, isn’t it?

It’s not “The Perfect Storm” for fucking food, eh?

EH???

Now I’m looking at the television set again and he’s doing a thing with some tiny potatoes and some unpeeled garlic cloves in a pan and he’s pressing down on the spuds and all with a kitchen implement of some fucking sort.

And he pulls two cloves of garlic from the pan and takes them over to the chopping board, eh?

“Look at that”, he said, as he mashed some fucking garlic with a fork, “Isn’t that GORGEOUS?”, he said.

And I said, I said to the FUCKING TELEVISION SET I said, I said aloud, I fucking did, I said, “No, it FUCKING isn’t!! It’s just some MASHED UP FUCKING GARLIC, you STUPID, STUPID, FUCKING CUNT!!!”

And then I went for a piss after that and came back and put a curry on.

Nice it was.

Lamb fucking KOOOOORrrrma.

Tags: , , ,

Choose your words

It’s 3am in Washington DC and World War III has just broken out. You’re the Secret Service agent charged with waking the President. You reach his bedroom door and hear the unmistakable sounds of Barack Obama bumping uglies with his wife Michelle. What do you say as you knock on the door and interrupt them?

Tags: ,