Archive for category Site news

Playing Politics with Tragedy

Terrorism is a fucked up thing. But why is it that before we even know the facts the usual clowns start using the tragedy to make a cheap political point? Without knowing anything about the attacks Andrew Bolt gleefully tried to insinuate an Islamic link.

 

Once the identity of the attackers becomes known, the consequences for Norway’s immigration policies could be profound:

 

You could see the angle he wanted to use. Muslims Muslims Boo!

The problem was, the facts weren’t known and when a suspect was arrested they didnt fit in with the Boltian world view. He was white, ethnic Norwegian, and allegedly he is Christian and conservative.

Did Andrew Bolt apologise for trying to connect the attack with Muslims with nothing to back it up apart from speculation from his own arse? Of course not, in an update he still somehow tried to connect the attack with Islam.

 

Even so, the history of Islamic violence in Scandinavia suggests Muslim immigration there has been a bad deal for the locals:

 

So even if it isn’t about Islam it still kind of is?

Keep digging that hole Andrew.

Thing is, we still don’t know too much about the motives for the attacks despite them arresting a suspect.  But why is it that some people try to score cheap political points from a tragedy before anything is even known? Now I could play the same stupid bigoted game that Andrew regularly plays and try to use this terrible attack as an excuse to smear all conservatives. But we know that this appalling attack would disgust most people, be they conservative, Marxist, Jewish, Muslim or Zoroastrian. So please, don’t just use these tragedies to sprout your own prejudices.

Tags: ,

cosmicjester’s half-arsed Mediawatch

What do you do if you are a god loving, Allah hating ultra-conservative who couldn’t be happier that Osama is dead but just can’t bring themselves to giving any credit to the socialist/Kenyan/Indonesian/homosexualist/Atheist-Radical-Muslim currently in the White House?

Note that it was all because of the torture enhanced interrogation methods. This ignores that waterboarding didn’t stop key prisoners from giving false information about the courier or downplaying his importance of traditional methods of covert intelligence that was used in finding bin Laden. To give all credit to waterboarding is misleading to the extreme.

Over at Andrew Bolt’s blog he has resorted to quoting a blog that no-one has heard of that claims that the military had to overrule Obama to kill bin Laden. Sound fishy? Military overruling the President, and the news is only available on some obscure blog? Well other stories from this blog that Andrew Bolt thinks is credible include one of a job advertisement in Romania for new Al-Qaeda leader, 14 year old girl has x-ray vision. Curious.

More articles from this site that Southbank superjournalist Andrew Bolt thinks is credible.

Alien UFO’s are really here.

Aliens gatecrash Royal wedding.

How Nostradamus predicted 9/11.

And yes, my personal favorite “Reptilian conspiracy theory

Just all part of the rigorous fact-checking by our Andrew Bolt. It’s not that he would believe any old rubbish if it happened to be anti-Obama. Not at all.

Bolt’s commenter’s are also not convinced.

There is NO DOUBT!

I think Obama, worked in conjunction with the RAND corporation in conjunction with the reverse-vampires staged the Osama raid to please our reptilian overlords. WHY DON’T YOU OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE!!!!

Seriously though, these people are insane.

Update: On twitter someone pointed out that they suspected the website is one of those that anyone can submit anything to so it is unfair of me to categorise the whole thing as crazy. To me that just sounds more damning, that Andrew Bolt would willingly quote something that is as credible as a forum post of Free Republic or 4chan. But in the interest of fairness I have looked at the author of the Obama was overruled article. Ultersman’s articles appear to be a collection of wacky rants and conspiracies mainly about the Obama administration. And what a surprise, he is also a birther.

Once again thats some kick ass fact checking and verifying you are doing Andrew Bolt.

Update 2: Bolt has finally realised the link was bogus. Very interesting what he will believe if it happens to be about someone he doesn’t like.

Some more info on Ultersman from Media Matters.

I know what I saw and I know what I heard.  I know who I saw.  Maybe it was some kind of phase he was going through at the time.  Maybe he was experimenting with a different lifestyle.  Maybe the death of that man was just a coincidence.  I don’t know the answers to that.  I just know what I know.  I just know what I heard and saw.  On that night I heard Barack Obama in that conference room with another man.  I saw Barack Obamastep out of that room with another man.  I smelled what I think was some kind of drug they were using.  And I know that the other man who was in that room with Barack Obama was murdered about ten years later shortly after Barack Obama declared he was running for President of the United States.

That is my story.  I hope that you share it.  If something happens to me now, you will know why.

Yes, Ultserman published an article claiming that someone walked in on Barack Obama involved in drug fueled sex with another man and then later the other man wound up mysteriously dead. This is wacky, fringe lunatic stuff and Andrew Bolt believed this guy to be credible. Amazing.

This also got a run in yesterdays Crikey here and here.

Tags: , , , ,

Should Groupthink Liveblog the Honeymoon?

Should Groupthink Liveblog the honeymoon?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Tags:

A few thoughts on that bullying video

I’m sure most of us have seen that video, of a bullied overweight boy finally snapping after a few punches in the face and slamming his aggressor into the ground. It wasn’t hard to give into your base emotions and feel that as violent and disproportionate the retaliation was, the little shit got what was coming to him. It was ugly, brutal, violent and we felt bad for getting so any enjoyment from the video.

I’d guess for me, like many others it was a brutal reminder of the often violent world of high school that we banished to the back of our minds as soon as we graduated. I’d say more than a few of us have been in Casey’s position and remember all too well a system that was unsympathetic to bullying victims and made many fearful to speak out.

Just what message does it send to children that both of the kids received the same punishment of four days suspension? Sure, it wasn’t ideal for the bullied child to retaliate with violence, but it was the school that failed in its duty of care by allowing such violence to go unchallenged on their grounds. The victim should not be punished because the system had failed to protect him. Its behaviour like this that makes children at school reluctant to speak out about being a victim of violence. Because if the school decides that violence in self-defence is just as bad as being a violent aggressor then children become wary that asking for help might just result in them being punished.

John Birmingham is right to point out that amongst all our cheering, we are lucky that Casey’s bodyslam didn’t result in a serious injury or even death. Penbo over at the punch goes off onto a wild tangent (not to mention calling the victim “Fat Kid” 9 times) comparing the video to the notorious Bumfights videos in the USA. The difference being that the internet and camera phones isn’t encouraging violence that wasn’t happening before, but its showing and reminding adults and education bureaucrats just how violent and horrible school is for many many children in a way they cant ignore it. The violence in the video is nothing new, but before the internet it was violence that adults rarely saw.

From news reports it seems like the parents of both of the children need a prompt wake up call. Casey’s father said ”He’s always been taught never to hit. Apparently other people’s parents don’t teach their kids that.” sounds like as idealistic way to teach your kid humanist values, but telling your kid to sit there like a punching bag isn’t going to solve anything or stop the violence. Likewise the bullies mother had a hard time believing that her little angel could be the tiny tormentor in the video clip. If anything is achieved from all this, lets hope that it forces parents and teachers to confront the living hell some kids endure at school and the system that stops them from speaking out.

Its sending a terrible message that a victim of years of bullying and violence is being punished by the school that clearly failed to protect him from violence for so many years.

Tags: , ,

A few thoughts on that bullying video

I’m sure most of us have seen that video, of a bullied overweight boy finally snapping after a few punches in the face and slamming his aggressor into the ground. It wasn’t hard to give into your base emotions and feel that as violent and disproportionate the retaliation was, the little shit got what was coming to him. It was ugly, brutal, violent and we felt bad for getting so any enjoyment from the video.

I’d guess for me, like many others it was a brutal reminder of the often violent world of high school that we banished to the back of our minds as soon as we graduated. I’d say more than a few of us have been in Casey’s position and remember all too well a system that was unsympathetic to bullying victims and made many fearful to speak out.

Just what message does it send to children that both of the kids received the same punishment of four days suspension? Sure, it wasn’t ideal for the bullied child to retaliate with violence, but it was the school that failed in its duty of care by allowing such violence to go unchallenged on their grounds. The victim should not be punished because the system had failed to protect him. Its behaviour like this that makes children at school reluctant to speak out about being a victim of violence. Because if the school decides that violence in self-defence is just as bad as being a violent aggressor then children become wary that asking for help might just result in them being punished.

John Birmingham is right to point out that amongst all our cheering, we are lucky that Casey’s bodyslam didn’t result in a serious injury or even death. Penbo over at the punch goes off onto a wild tangent (not to mention calling the victim “Fat Kid” 9 times) comparing the video to the notorious Bumfights videos in the USA. The difference being that the internet and camera phones isn’t encouraging violence that wasn’t happening before, but its showing and reminding adults and education bureaucrats just how violent and horrible school is for many many children in a way they cant ignore it. The violence in the video is nothing new, but before the internet it was violence that adults rarely saw.

From news reports it seems like the parents of both of the children need a prompt wake up call. Casey’s father said “He’s always been taught never to hit. Apparently other people’s parents don’t teach their kids that.” sounds like as idealistic way to teach your kid humanist values, but telling your kid to sit there like a punching bag isn’t going to solve anything or stop the violence. Likewise the bullies mother had a hard time believing that her little angel could be the tiny tormentor in the video clip. If anything is achieved from all this, lets hope that it forces parents and teachers to confront the living hell some kids endure at school and the system that stops them from speaking out.

Its sending a terrible message that a victim of years of bullying and violence is being punished by the school that clearly failed to protect him from violence for so many years.

Tags: , ,

A few thoughts on that bullying video

I’m sure most of us have seen that video, of a bullied overweight boy finally snapping after a few punches in the face and slamming his aggressor into the ground. It wasn’t hard to give into your base emotions and feel that as violent and disproportionate the retaliation was, the little shit got what was coming to him. It was ugly, brutal, violent and we felt bad for getting so any enjoyment from the video.

I’d guess for me, like many others it was a brutal reminder of the often violent world of high school that we banished to the back of our minds as soon as we graduated. I’d say more than a few of us have been in Casey’s position and remember all too well a system that was unsympathetic to bullying victims and made many fearful to speak out.

Just what message does it send to children that both of the kids received the same punishment of four days suspension? Sure, it wasn’t ideal for the bullied child to retaliate with violence, but it was the school that failed in its duty of care by allowing such violence to go unchallenged on their grounds. The victim should not be punished because the system had failed to protect him. Its behaviour like this that makes children at school reluctant to speak out about being a victim of violence. Because if the school decides that violence in self-defence is just as bad as being a violent aggressor then children become wary that asking for help might just result in them being punished.

John Birmingham is right to point out that amongst all our cheering, we are lucky that Casey’s bodyslam didn’t result in a serious injury or even death. Penbo over at the punch goes off onto a wild tangent (not to mention calling the victim “Fat Kid” 9 times) comparing the video to the notorious Bumfights videos in the USA. The difference being that the internet and camera phones isn’t encouraging violence that wasn’t happening before, but its showing and reminding adults and education bureaucrats just how violent and horrible school is for many many children in a way they cant ignore it. The violence in the video is nothing new, but before the internet it was violence that adults rarely saw.

From news reports it seems like the parents of both of the children need a prompt wake up call. Casey’s father said “He’s always been taught never to hit. Apparently other people’s parents don’t teach their kids that.” sounds like as idealistic way to teach your kid humanist values, but telling your kid to sit there like a punching bag isn’t going to solve anything or stop the violence. Likewise the bullies mother had a hard time believing that her little angel could be the tiny tormentor in the video clip. If anything is achieved from all this, lets hope that it forces parents and teachers to confront the living hell some kids endure at school and the system that stops them from speaking out.

Its sending a terrible message that a victim of years of bullying and violence is being punished by the school that clearly failed to protect him from violence for so many years.

Tags: , ,

Groupthink movie review – Tron Legacy

Belated Happy Christmases and Merry New Years Groupthinkers. Its been a tad quiet of late as we all deal with the family issues and hangovers common for this time of year, so lets warm things up with a movie review.

The original Tron is one of those movies that everyone has heard of, but very few people have actually seen. It wasnt a hit but is well known for being the first movie to rely heavily on CGI a full 13 years before Toy Story. I have tried to watch it, twice and although it is obvious that the technology for the effects were cutting edge for their day, but now they look like something that came out of an Atari 2600. It didnt really have an engaging story from what I could tell beyond “computer guy gets zapped into computer and learns to play digital frisbee and motorcycle against bad digital people”.

Nostalgia being what it is, with even Tron getting a cult following Disney greenlit a sequel with the hope that cashed up 80′s babies like myself (minus the cashed up) would pay 25 bucks to see a 3D sequel.

So whats the latest one about? The kid of the guy from then first Tron movie is fatherless after his dad got sucked into Tron 20 years back. The dads software company has since turned into an arrogant Apple or Microsoft instead of a fun loving video game developer and the son is a motorbike riding warez fiend who steals the companies new OS and shares it via torrents before it is officially released. Topical. Oh and he has an iPhone like smartphone too.

Kid follows a message from his long lost dad and gets sucked into the computer world where bits and bytes are like living people, or something.

Seriously did anyone who saw this not only follow the story, but actually like it? Bits and bytes that dont follow the orwellian rule of the leader of the computer world are forced to fight in gladitorial games of frisbee and motorcycles, just like the first film. The computer people that lose the games are then erased, which made me think if every time I format by hard drive I might be committing a virtual holocaust? I guess the hard thing about making characters out of computer people is it is hard to make them interesting. All of the dialogue between the characters of the Tron world kind of falls flat.

Luckily most of the movie isnt spend talking but riding around on lightcycles and blowing things up to the music of Daft Punk in funky 3D. This is where the movie truly shines. As a narrative I’d give it two meh’s out of five, but as a 3D feature length Daft Punk film clip its a solid three stars. Spoiler alert, the good guys win and the kid takes a computer girl out of Tron and into the real world, which begs the question, what does a computer girl from Tron have for genitalia?

But I’ll leave the final word to Homer Simpson.

News from the mother country

When the highly regarded British press isnt stalking Royals, celebs or setting up stings for Fergie they really are the masters of their craft. Take this report from the Daily Mail on the current floods wreaking havoc up here.

I’d hate to be living in the State of Capricornia right now. Any state named after the final Midnight Oil record was always doomed to fail. (A more appropriate name for the North half of Queensland should really have been Midnight Oil’s second last album)

via @thewetmale

Tags: , , ,

[Hilarious HTML title that Spock tried to insert but can't be displayed by WordPress]

image

Happy New Year from the Falls festival, Groupthinkers.
I hope you all got nice and trashy last night and made out with your best friend, woke up with a stranger in your bed and had a greasy breakfast in an attempt to fight the anvil that was resting on your head.
All has been quiet on the blog recently, but I’m sure we will return to regular programming once all this festive bullshit is over.
In the meantime, have we all made New Years resolutions? Or maybe you got up to some real mischief last night…

Tags:

Vag it up

There have been many wild and vicious rumours floating around Twitter tonight that I would like to put to bed.

Groupthink is not sexist.

Women are the subject of many posts on Groupthink. Sometimes even favourably.

Our comment policy does not restrict women from commenting on our posts.

Women have been allowed to vote in Groupthink polls since day one.

But it seems all of this is not enough. Groupthink are still being smeared as if we are some kind of “boys club”, and this is simply not the case.

So maybe we will need to make more of an effort to appease  you chicks.

How would you like Groupthink  to “Vag it up” a bit?

Tags: , ,