Archive for category Media

Election 2010: driving me to apathy

I want so desperately not to care. I wish I could look at politics and feel “this doesn’t affect me” like so many other normal people.

I care who wins the election. I care about health policy. I care about education policy. I care about environmental policy and transport policy. I care that millions of Australians – mostly Indigenous – live in poverty. I care that there are children who can’t read. I care that commited couples who want to get married can’t.

But what angers me the most is that each passing day of this election campaign I seem to care less and less.

With each day that goes by I feel more anger, that passes into dispair that passes into apathy. My disillusionment with politics is almost complete, my apathy almost final. Election campaign 2010 was the culprit; the final nail in the coffin of my passion for politics.

I guess it was naive of me, and I should have listened to the people who were much older than me when they tried to warn me. But I genuinely believed that government could be a force for the betterment of society. I believed that passionate people could show leadership and inspire a country to make itself better. Use the tools of government to make life for all people in Australia fairer and more equitable. My optimism shown to be completely foolish by the 2010 election campaign.

It was pretty tragic to see a sitting Prime Minister outed by his own party before the end of his first term. Rudd had lost his ability to sell, and there was no doubt that was causing problems. But I suspect Rudd was being frustrated from within: bad advice and wavering internal support for his policy positions would have made his job very difficult. The whole affair was made all the more tragic when he went public earlier this week to defend his achievements. Kevin Rudd made the most concise and convincing attack on Tony Abbott that has been made for the entire campaign. His appearance on Late Night Live filled me with something akin to joy. Finally someone from the ALP was articulating what needed to be said.

But it was short lived. The media turned his appearance into a soap opera. A will they/won’t they saga between Gillard and Rudd designed to play out in prime time news bulletins.

And all once again seemed hopelessly lost.

The media. To the pack of journalists (sic) who get paid to follow the candidates around, it’s not about you. It was never about you. The tax payers fund your junket. Politicians might occasionally not answer your questions. Sometimes they might run a little late, change their plans at the last minute and sometimes you might not get a policy document in advance. This may inconvenience you a little bit, you may have to work a little bit harder before filing. You may even get tired from standing up all day. Deal with it. Politicians aren’t there to make your job easy. They are trying to get reelected and sometimes journalistic scrutiny isn’t what they want.

So when you do get to ask them questions, you should scrutinize their policy. The tax-payer doesn’t fund your Australia wide travel so you can ask questions about why Tim isn’t campaigning with Julia, your there to ask questions of their policy, after all one of these people will be the leader of the country.

When Tony Abbott says. “Stop the taxes” you ask “What taxes? How will you recover the money?” when he says “Stop the waste,” you ask “To what waste are your referring, Tony? How much money is being ‘wasted’ and how do you propose we stop it?” and when he says “Stop the boats” you ask him “How do we stop the boats and why should we stop them?”

When they announce a policy you don’t ask them why their boyfriend isn’t there, you ask them about the policy.

Don’t complain about how this campaign has been dominated by distractions then report only on the distractions. You shouldn’t be making it harder for politicians to talk about issues. You should make it harder for them to be distracted from the issues.

Mark Latham is not an issue. Tim Mathieson is not an issue. Cabinet discussions are not an issue. The calluses on your feet are not an issue. Your boredom with the campaign is not an issue. Julia Gillard’s earlobes are not an issue and nor is what the Internet thinks of them.

Journalists of the press pack, editors, news directors and media moguls: political discourse in this country is broken and it’s all your fault.

So yes, Gillard is pretty uninspiring. Yes, Tony Abbott just scares me. The ALP and the Liberal Party look more and more alike. But that’s not it.

I think I lost faith in politics because of the media. Because ultimately, if anyone was in a position to raise political discoure in this country, it is the media. The media asks the questions. The media reports the news. All political discourse is mediated, the media can raise the level of this discourse.

I want to make this country better. I want those who are disadvantaged to be helped. I want those who do not have rights given rights. I want preserve the planet on which I live. But it’s all starting to feel a little hopeless. The whole system just isn’t working.

I’m not really angry, I’m not even surprised anymore. I’m just disappointed. I thought it could be different.

14 Comments

I’m done.

Stop the world, I would like to get off now.

Justin Bieber is set to play himself in a 3D biopic.

Canadian-born Bieber, 16, shot to stardom after recordings of him singing and dancing were spotted by music manager Scooter Braun on YouTube.

He was signed by Island Records and has since topped charts worldwide with his album My World 2.0.

Now the story of Bieber’s phenomenal rise to fame is coming to the big screen in 2011.

Oscar-winning filmmaker Davis Guggenheim, best known for the documentary An Inconvenient Truth, has been lined up to direct.

On Twitter, Bieber wrote: “This is so sick!! Gonna come out in theatre’s Worldwide Valentine’s 2011!!! I’m taking this thing worldwide thanks to u all!! Hyped!!”

3D bio-pic? 3D!? Why 3D? Let along the other major question this raises, why a bi0-pic?

What’s next, an Autobiography?

Oh…

*bashes head repeatedly against desk*

6 Comments

Journalism [sic]

A nomination for The Gold Balkley: This effort from The Age about  the “first bloke”.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard won’t be trotting out Australia’s ‘‘first bloke’’ on the campaign trail.

Ms Gillard arrived and departed the National Press Club for the leaders’ debate in Canberra last night solo.

In contrast, opposition leader Tony Abbott was flanked by his wife, Margie.

Pressed on the absence of her partner, Tim Mathieson, the prime minister said she enjoyed his full support.

Mr Mathieson viewed his job as supporting the newly-installed prime minister, but not to accompany her on the campaign.

‘‘He is not a Labor party official or a candidate or a minister so you won’t see him out on the campaign trail in that sense,’’ Ms Gillard told reporters in Launceston today.

I would like to nominate whoever asked Australia’s Prime Minister about what her partner was doing during an election campaign.

Julia Gillard makes a policy announcement about health spending, and you ask about the boyfriend?

“Where is Tim?”, they asked.

They could have asked about health. They could have asked why Immigration was such a big issue during the election campaign, or ask how outsourcing policy to a “Citizen’s assembly” was good policy for an elected government.

They really, could have asked anything, but they asked about her boyfriend on the campaign trail.

They really need to stop handing out these press passes to New Idea.

No Comments

Introducing the Gold Balkley

golden-turd

The Gold Balkley

Balk noun: something immaterial that interferes with or delays action or progress

Groupthink is pleased to introduce the Gold Balkley, a new media award offered to the journalist or news organisation that dismays us with a shit story or line of questioning during the 2010 Election campaign that contributes nothing of informative value. Please feel free to nominate any examples of immaterial journalism during the next four weeks, including anything you may have seen, heard or read during week one of the campaign.

If anyone gives a shit and we receive nominations we will make a shortlist and put it to a poll to see who is the winner of the Gold Balkley for Election 2010.

I’ll get the ball rolling by nominating ABC News24’s political editor Chris Uhlmann for wasting valuable pre-Masterchef time during the election debate to again ask Julia Gillard about her discussions between she and Kevin Rudd before the spill, instead of asking about important policy issues such as health, broadband/internet censorship, gay marriage; you know, shit that really matters.

Please nominate such efforts. We’ll need a name (of a journalist, interviewer or news outlet) and an explanation of what they have done to earn their nomination - if you have a link to the nominated piece of work that would be awesome.

Please note that award is not open to columnists, bloggers or TV/radio show panellists - I think we’d go insane if we logged every piece of shit they come out with until August 21.

Nominations close August 22.

20 Comments

Bad reporting or deliberate class provocation?

Yesterday Tony Abbott declared the Coalition would expand the existing Education Tax Rebate to include school fees for all eligible students.

According to the Liberal Party’s press release:

“For primary students, this would mean a rebate to up to $500 per year per child in primary school. Eligible families will be able to claim a 50 per cent rebate for up to $1,000 of eligible education-related expenses for each child in primary school.

“For secondary school students, we will increase the rebate to up to $1,000 per year per child. Eligible families will be able to claim a 50 per cent rebate for up to $2,000 of education-related expenses for each child in secondary school.”

The payment is available for students at state, independent and private schools. But the government school element of this seems to have been lost on the Fairfax press, which ran with this intro:

Parents will be entitled to claim generous fee subsidies for sending their children to private and independent schools as part of the Coalition’s expanded education rebate policy.

Nowhere in the story that follows does it mention that state school students are eligible for the tax rebate, or that it is only available to parents on Family Tax Benefit A – meaning it’s already Centrelink means tested. In fact at the end of the story there is a poll which asks:

Do you think students should be able to claim a rebate on private school fees?

Which is shorthand for, should rich parents be allowed to claim tax benefits for sending their kid to Scotch College?

The Australian got into the act as well, with:

PARENTS will be able to claim for private school fees, violin lessons and dance and drama classes under the Coalition’s education tax rebate.

Do you like the addition of violin in there?

It’s true government schools don’t have fees, but they do have voluntary levies (in Victoria at least) which parents are strongly “encouraged” to pay. There have been cases of schools threatening to withhold extra-curricular services from children, such as excursions and sports carnivals subsidised by the levy, if parents don’t pay up. These levies are generally under $100 for primary school and under $200 for secondary schools, and are on top of the cost of books, uniforms, camps, shoes etc. The notion of free government schooling is virtually a myth.

Now I am the last person to defend private schools (or Liberal Party policy for that matter). However, stories on election announcements should be accurate, informative and totally objective without a sensationalist angle. If ever a journalist’s primary role of gathering information, assessing it and presenting it in an easy to digest and accurate manner was important it’s during an election campaign. Why skew a story for a decent headline when offering people tax breaks for school fees is interesting enough?

Of course, it is debatable whether or not there should be tax rebates for private school fees, but there’s a big difference between including private schools in such a scheme and it being exclusive public schools when it comes to people’s opinions on the matter.

For the record I’m sick of middle class welfare for cost of living expenses such as school fees when family carers of disabled children are doing it touch because they are unable to work and often receive less than the aged pension.

5 Comments

Rudd gaffe: puts electorate before journalists

Kevin Rudd should be in damage control for putting children before journalists - say journalists.

Kevin Rudd should be in damage control for putting children before journalists, say journalists.

Kevin Rudd’s first appearance of the election campaign bordered on ludicrous today as he snubbed the most important people in this election campaign, the travelling media pack.

Mr Rudd refused to answer questions of the journalists, who were most considerate when repeatedly yelling out the same question about his relationship with Prime Minister Julia Gillard, as he tried to talk to a group of school children.

The man who was ousted as prime minister three and a half weeks ago spruiked something trivial about  the benefits of school spending to Year 3 and Year 4 students, totally oblivious to the needs of the journalists, some of whom invested in new clothes and opened Twitter accounts specially for this election campaign

Mr Rudd wanted media coverage – be there at 12:15pm, the hard-working, all-important reporters were told.

They obliged, some even had to catch taxis, and 45 minutes later the local member arrived at the school’s back entrance, then took the chatty principal with him to the front entrance where the waiting media cameras rolled.

The anxious media scrum, some with sore feet, encircled Mr Rudd as he spoke to principal Greg Kretschmann about facilities built with stimulus program funding.

But today, in Mr Rudd’s safe Labor seat of Griffith in Brisbane’s south, it seemed Cooparoo State School was the place where you are not supposed to ask questions, even in the unlikely event they were sensible ones.

“This is just great,” said one journalist sarcastically. “We’re not here to show him looking at schools and communicating with children from his electorate. He should be talking to us about what’s most important in this election campaign; his relationship with Julia Gillard. Doesn’t he know who we are?

“First they make us fly in a loud air force Hercules and now this.”

Mr Rudd finally spoke to journalists as he walked to his tax-payer funded Commonwealth car.

“I’ll just say one thing before I go… and that is throughout this election campaign I’ll be speaking only about local issues here in my community here in Griffith, such as this school building program, and the need to complete that program in each and every one of the 42 primary schools in my electorate,” he said, pretending to be oblivious as to what election campaigns are really about.

Apologies to the ABC’s Annie Guest

2 Comments

Seriously…

This is what our press gallery is doing:

Screen shot 2010-07-20 at 2.18.33 PM

Seeking comment from Paris Hilton! Paris. Fucking. Hilton.

Are they for realz!!1!?

They are asking Paris Hilton for comment on this? Really? Fo’ Shiz?

Joe Hockey is to humour as lime is to beer. It has no place there!

I assume his weight is now fair game though, which is good news for most of the internet.

7 Comments

Sometimes it is like The West Wing

Australian politics, and the Australian political media are by now well into election mode. It is all about the campaign and it’s probably all we will hear about for the next 6 weeks.

But as David lamented yesterday the Australian Media doesn’t seem too interested in discussing policy.

And so far the trend continues, as politicians roll on with their election campaigns, the press continues to ask questions, not about policy, but about campaign process, gaffes and MasterChef!

THE nation may be in the grip of an election campaign but even its political masters have acknowledged they cannot compete with their kitchen counterparts.

So much so that consideration is being given to either bringing the leaders’ debate forward by an hour, or delaying it until another evening so it does not clash with the series final of the hit show MasterChef

All the press wants to write about is process.

It was a dawn start in Brisbane and a long flight to Townsville to visit a little family in a new housing estate to drive home her message that we should “stop, take a breath and plan a sustainable Australia”.

And preference deals, and the price of coffee.

Gillard announces policy, the press asks about process and a “stage managed campaign”. Tony stage manages a campaign and do they ask him about his lack of policies (except that spending money is BAAAAAD *scary music*)?

It all reminds me of Josh Lyman’s line in The West Wing about getting the press to write about issues.

It’s gonna look like we screwed up the timing so the press is gonna write about process and not about issues, and getting political reporters to write about issues in the first place is like getting kids to eat their vegetables.

[...]

It helps if there’s nothing else on their plate.

Sometimes Australian politics can remind me a little bit of The West Wing.

No Comments

Asking the questions that matter #2

Prime Minister Julia Gillard spent part of the third full day of the election campaign in Richmond in Sydney’s west, to announce the national trade cadetship scheme to combat Australia’s skills shortage.

Under the initiative, students from years 9 to 12 would be offered the cadetship as an option under the national curriculum and would utilise the resources of the trade training centres being introduced to secondary schools around Australia.

Two streams of the national trade cadetship would be available including one stream which lays the foundation for further training and a second which focuses on achieving an apprenticeship in a specific area or trade.

“Currently around 220,000 students do study vocational education and training at school,” the Prime Minister said.

“That’s around 41 per cent of kids going into senior secondary certificates.”

This is an important policy, which addresses the skills shortages but also the educational needs of those teenagers left out by the secondary education’s emphasis on preparing for a university degree. So, which of the following questions did the assembled media pack ask when they got some q-and-a time with the Prime Minister?

A. Prime Minister, will the cadetship scheme be backed up with an increase in apprenticeship opportunities? For example will you offer incentives to large companies to recommence apprentice intakes that were common up until the 1990s?

B. Are community cabinets a waste of taxpayer dollars?

C. Are you running an overly staged managed campaign? When will you get out on the streets and shopping centres?

D. I’m wondering how you’re standing up under the campaign. Are you getting enough sleep?

If you guessed B. C. and D., you are correct.

1 Comment

Asking the questions that matter #1

On the first full day of the 2010 election campaign, Julia Gillard went to Brisbane where she made a speech about population and sustainablity in which she expressed her desire to put the brakes on the fast track to a big Australia.

“I do not believe in the idea of a big Australia, an Australia where we push all the policy levers into top gear to drive population growth as high as it can be,’’ said the Prime Minister.

“The nation’s goal should not be a big Australia but a ‘‘sustainable’’ Australia that ‘‘preserves our quality of life and respects our environment’’.

‘‘One of the things Australians often say when we’ve spent a few days in a crowded, congested city in Europe or the United States: it’s a nice place to visit, but you wouldn’t want to live there.

‘‘Friends, I will not allow Australia to ever become a country of which it is said: it’s a nice place to visit, but you wouldn’t want to live there,” she said.’

So, we have some policy which, while being a little boring, is important especially to regional towns. So, which of the following questions did the assembled media pack ask when they got some q-and-a time with the Prime Minister?

A.“Ms Gillard, let me get this straight. Are you against population growth or do you just want to slow it down to better control it?”

B. “How will we combat the ageing population if we slow migration down?”

C. “Prime Minister, the reason why Australia’s cities are choking is because successive state and federal governments have been slow to keep up with infrastructure. You mentioned the Snowy Mountain Hydro Scheme, have you considered a similar grand project where we can build the much needed infrastructure to allow for more people? 

D. “Will you be campaigning with Kevin Rudd in his electorate?

 

If you answered D, you’re correct!

7 Comments