Archive for category Education

A few thoughts on that bullying video

I’m sure most of us have seen that video, of a bullied overweight boy finally snapping after a few punches in the face and slamming his aggressor into the ground. It wasn’t hard to give into your base emotions and feel that as violent and disproportionate the retaliation was, the little shit got what was coming to him. It was ugly, brutal, violent and we felt bad for getting so any enjoyment from the video.

I’d guess for me, like many others it was a brutal reminder of the often violent world of high school that we banished to the back of our minds as soon as we graduated. I’d say more than a few of us have been in Casey’s position and remember all too well a system that was unsympathetic to bullying victims and made many fearful to speak out.

Just what message does it send to children that both of the kids received the same punishment of four days suspension? Sure, it wasn’t ideal for the bullied child to retaliate with violence, but it was the school that failed in its duty of care by allowing such violence to go unchallenged on their grounds. The victim should not be punished because the system had failed to protect him. Its behaviour like this that makes children at school reluctant to speak out about being a victim of violence. Because if the school decides that violence in self-defence is just as bad as being a violent aggressor then children become wary that asking for help might just result in them being punished.

John Birmingham is right to point out that amongst all our cheering, we are lucky that Casey’s bodyslam didn’t result in a serious injury or even death. Penbo over at the punch goes off onto a wild tangent (not to mention calling the victim “Fat Kid” 9 times) comparing the video to the notorious Bumfights videos in the USA. The difference being that the internet and camera phones isn’t encouraging violence that wasn’t happening before, but its showing and reminding adults and education bureaucrats just how violent and horrible school is for many many children in a way they cant ignore it. The violence in the video is nothing new, but before the internet it was violence that adults rarely saw.

From news reports it seems like the parents of both of the children need a prompt wake up call. Casey’s father said ”He’s always been taught never to hit. Apparently other people’s parents don’t teach their kids that.” sounds like as idealistic way to teach your kid humanist values, but telling your kid to sit there like a punching bag isn’t going to solve anything or stop the violence. Likewise the bullies mother had a hard time believing that her little angel could be the tiny tormentor in the video clip. If anything is achieved from all this, lets hope that it forces parents and teachers to confront the living hell some kids endure at school and the system that stops them from speaking out.

Its sending a terrible message that a victim of years of bullying and violence is being punished by the school that clearly failed to protect him from violence for so many years.

Tags: , ,

A few thoughts on that bullying video

I’m sure most of us have seen that video, of a bullied overweight boy finally snapping after a few punches in the face and slamming his aggressor into the ground. It wasn’t hard to give into your base emotions and feel that as violent and disproportionate the retaliation was, the little shit got what was coming to him. It was ugly, brutal, violent and we felt bad for getting so any enjoyment from the video.

I’d guess for me, like many others it was a brutal reminder of the often violent world of high school that we banished to the back of our minds as soon as we graduated. I’d say more than a few of us have been in Casey’s position and remember all too well a system that was unsympathetic to bullying victims and made many fearful to speak out.

Just what message does it send to children that both of the kids received the same punishment of four days suspension? Sure, it wasn’t ideal for the bullied child to retaliate with violence, but it was the school that failed in its duty of care by allowing such violence to go unchallenged on their grounds. The victim should not be punished because the system had failed to protect him. Its behaviour like this that makes children at school reluctant to speak out about being a victim of violence. Because if the school decides that violence in self-defence is just as bad as being a violent aggressor then children become wary that asking for help might just result in them being punished.

John Birmingham is right to point out that amongst all our cheering, we are lucky that Casey’s bodyslam didn’t result in a serious injury or even death. Penbo over at the punch goes off onto a wild tangent (not to mention calling the victim “Fat Kid” 9 times) comparing the video to the notorious Bumfights videos in the USA. The difference being that the internet and camera phones isn’t encouraging violence that wasn’t happening before, but its showing and reminding adults and education bureaucrats just how violent and horrible school is for many many children in a way they cant ignore it. The violence in the video is nothing new, but before the internet it was violence that adults rarely saw.

From news reports it seems like the parents of both of the children need a prompt wake up call. Casey’s father said “He’s always been taught never to hit. Apparently other people’s parents don’t teach their kids that.” sounds like as idealistic way to teach your kid humanist values, but telling your kid to sit there like a punching bag isn’t going to solve anything or stop the violence. Likewise the bullies mother had a hard time believing that her little angel could be the tiny tormentor in the video clip. If anything is achieved from all this, lets hope that it forces parents and teachers to confront the living hell some kids endure at school and the system that stops them from speaking out.

Its sending a terrible message that a victim of years of bullying and violence is being punished by the school that clearly failed to protect him from violence for so many years.

Tags: , ,

A few thoughts on that bullying video

I’m sure most of us have seen that video, of a bullied overweight boy finally snapping after a few punches in the face and slamming his aggressor into the ground. It wasn’t hard to give into your base emotions and feel that as violent and disproportionate the retaliation was, the little shit got what was coming to him. It was ugly, brutal, violent and we felt bad for getting so any enjoyment from the video.

I’d guess for me, like many others it was a brutal reminder of the often violent world of high school that we banished to the back of our minds as soon as we graduated. I’d say more than a few of us have been in Casey’s position and remember all too well a system that was unsympathetic to bullying victims and made many fearful to speak out.

Just what message does it send to children that both of the kids received the same punishment of four days suspension? Sure, it wasn’t ideal for the bullied child to retaliate with violence, but it was the school that failed in its duty of care by allowing such violence to go unchallenged on their grounds. The victim should not be punished because the system had failed to protect him. Its behaviour like this that makes children at school reluctant to speak out about being a victim of violence. Because if the school decides that violence in self-defence is just as bad as being a violent aggressor then children become wary that asking for help might just result in them being punished.

John Birmingham is right to point out that amongst all our cheering, we are lucky that Casey’s bodyslam didn’t result in a serious injury or even death. Penbo over at the punch goes off onto a wild tangent (not to mention calling the victim “Fat Kid” 9 times) comparing the video to the notorious Bumfights videos in the USA. The difference being that the internet and camera phones isn’t encouraging violence that wasn’t happening before, but its showing and reminding adults and education bureaucrats just how violent and horrible school is for many many children in a way they cant ignore it. The violence in the video is nothing new, but before the internet it was violence that adults rarely saw.

From news reports it seems like the parents of both of the children need a prompt wake up call. Casey’s father said “He’s always been taught never to hit. Apparently other people’s parents don’t teach their kids that.” sounds like as idealistic way to teach your kid humanist values, but telling your kid to sit there like a punching bag isn’t going to solve anything or stop the violence. Likewise the bullies mother had a hard time believing that her little angel could be the tiny tormentor in the video clip. If anything is achieved from all this, lets hope that it forces parents and teachers to confront the living hell some kids endure at school and the system that stops them from speaking out.

Its sending a terrible message that a victim of years of bullying and violence is being punished by the school that clearly failed to protect him from violence for so many years.

Tags: , ,

We don’t need your prejudices

The National School Chaplaincy Program is bullshit. That is, more or less, the point I am going to try and make with this post. It is a point that I don’t think is too hard to make. It seems to me the only people who think the idea of federally funded religious chaplains is government and private schools are the religious chaplains and their church backers.

The Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations released a discussion paper last month on the chaplaincy program and have asked for community feedback. The Christian Lobby groups have faithfully complied. It’s not hard to see why the Christian lobbies are so vehemently behind this program.

Have a look at this breakdown of where the school chaplains money is going. Though Christians only make up 63.89% of the population over 98% of the funding is going towards Christian chaplains. 0.01% is going to secular “chaplains”.

In the discussion paper they discuss changing the name away from ‘chaplain’ because some stakeholders “held reservations about the terminology”. Specifically “The Australian Council of State Schools Organisations expressed the view that a change in terminology would be preferable to avoid confusion and encourage alternatives.” May I suggest “counsellor” as the preferred terminology?

There is also discussion about the minimal qualifications for the chaplain. May I suggest “degree”?

In my years of adolescent angst, where molehills felt like mountains and I was fighting the world on my own, I saw two high school counsellors. One held no formal qualifications, was highly religious and spoke a lot about his faith in our 2 sessions. His faith was not my faith and did more to alienate me than it did help. I left those sessions feeling more isolated and angry than I did before them. The other counsellor may well have been religious but I genuinely wouldn’t know. There were a couple of certificates on his wall… I didn’t pay that much attention to what they were but I would almost guarantee one of them was psychology. He told me things about myself, he exposed fears I didn’t realize I had and gently guided me to my own awareness. I left those sessions feeling centered and far more confident than I was before them.

This is just my story, but I am sure there are others which are similar.

Children and adolescents need qualified, neutral and secular counselors. These are kids dealing with issues of sexuality and identity. They do not need anybody’s religious prejudices.

There is no way you can tweak the NSCP to make it work. The program needs to be scrapped. Use the money to put qualified secular counsellors in schools. Put people in who are helpful to all students. Stop using federal tax dollars to fund religious programs in public schools. It’s bullshit.

Tags: ,

Not quite schoolies

The last day of high school in 1976 was cancelled on account some reprobate hoons started muck-up day early by throwing flour bombs up and down the corridors of the school about 9am, having already tossed eggs over the roof of the canteen block and onto the heads of the crowd who were lined up for assembly earlier that morning.

So whatever had been planned, the Principal canned it, and we all went our various ways about eleven o’clock in the a.m., and that was the end of all that.

A few days later, five of us met up. We thought we may as well take advantage of this brief window of freedom and liberty between the end of schooldays and the beginning of our working life, what was to be the beginning of almost fifty years of time where every hope, every ambition, every fleeting fancy of the future as a fantasia of ever stunning marvels would gradually be ground down to irritating grits of devil dust forever to be flung into our dim and weary eyes.

Or, in other words, our young lives had yet to be moulded by the onerous demands of modern office life and its infinitely stimulating rigours.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , ,

Lesbians, Schoolgirls, Formals OH MY!

By now you have probably read the outrage of the day. A private girls school in Melbourne is being criticised for banning a female student from bringing her same sex partner to the formal. My take on the situation? Although it has become a big story for a relatively  small issue, the only way these schools are likely to change their policies is by criticism from the media and the general public. The likelihood of a government politician criticising or taking action against the discrimination is next to nil, the Christian and private school lobby’s can make their life hard at the next election so they dont try and upset them (private school “hitlist” anyone?).

The schools Principal has claimed that it wasnt discrimination but due to other factors. Unfortunately for her, her excuses contradict each other.

In the Herald Sun she said

“The school is not discriminatory against same-sex couples,” she told Radio 3AW.

“We are very very supportive, but the issue here is that it was a year 11 event and it was inappropriate to enable year 10s to attend.”

“It’s not a discrimination based on sexual orientation. It was trying to keep it a year 11 event.

Dr Schnagl said Ms Williams was told to bring a boy or come on her own, and says Hannah would have been given permission to bring a year 11 girl.

But in an interview she gave to the Age she said this…

‘If we opened it up and said girls could bring another female they would all bring females; the policy is trying to create an event where boys are invited. We are a school that has an all-girls environment, and they are meant to invite guests, not partners.”


So which one is it? She is allowed to bring a female just as long as they are in year 11, or they cant bring a female because it would turn the entire population of the school gay? I guess if you are going to lie, pick one and stick to it.

This may be a relatively small issue but it is still important. People learn how to treat people through their peers and role models at a young age. If the staff of a girls school says that it is OK to discriminate based on sexuality, and that is coming from a pretty powerful authority figure, how many girls from Ivanhoe Girls Grammar will think that discrimination based on sexuality is acceptable? The little things do matter.

It may not be direct homophobia, it could just be a bunch of old conservative fogeys stuck in their old fuddy duddy ways. But its still not OK.

Tags: ,

50,000 people are pretty insecure

I don’t know what came over me when I subscribed to the Australian Christian Lobby’s RSS feed. I guess part of me just thought that my blood pressure was too low. But thanks to whatever pearl of wisdom lead me to subscribing to their blog, I now get regular updates like this delivered straight to my RSS reader.

A staggering 50,000 people have called on the NSW Government to protect the place of special religious education (SRE) in schools and reschedule the proposed ethics classes to another time slot.

Christians from all major Christian denominations across NSW have signed a petition organised by the Australian Christian Lobby (ACL) which was tabled in NSW Parliament yesterday.

ACL’s NSW Director David Hutt said today that the overwhelming support for the Save Our Scripture petition should send a clear message to NSW parliamentarians about the need to safeguard the special place of SRE in NSW schools.

You see, the ACL and other religious organisations are feeling threatened by the NSW governments decision to trial ethics classes in state schools in the same time slot as special religious education (SRE) classes. Under the current arrangement in NSW for one hour every week schools hold these SRE classes with leaders of their religions, with various religions being represented. These classes are optional, but there is no option for parents of no faith so kids who do not attend one of these classes are left to do private study for an hour. What this leads to (and presumably what the religions like about this) is kids attending religious classes because there are no other options, even if they are not especially (or even at all) religious.

This is where ethics classes come in.

Ethics classes provide a secular alternative to SRE classes for those kids who are currently attending a SRE class out of convenience or simply not attending any classes for that hour a week. The problem is, apparently, that ethics classes are ‘competing’ with SRE and children are forced to ‘choose’ between the two.

“The Government should not be discriminating against children of faith who will not be able to attend both SRE and ethics. The classes should be run at separate times.”

I have an even better solution. Let’s not run SRE classes in public schools. Then there will be no problem about conflicting schedules.

Don’t get me wrong, I have no problem with children being taught religion in public schools, but only when it’s done with the same scepticism that is afforded politics and history (after all, it really is history and politics). I do not support kids learning particular religious narratives in public schools. If parents want their children to learn a particular religious narrative then those parents should be taking their kids to church and enrolling them in private religious schools, not expecting public schools to offer it to all schools.

Religious education not being offered in public schools is not an attack on religion. I am not anti-religion. Religions are not being discriminated against by not being allowed into public schools and to claim that they are is cynical and disingenuous. The opposite is true. Allowing religious education in schools the way NSW does discriminates against students who do not belong to a religion. Offering secular ethics classes to children is a step in the right direction, but I still don’t believe SRE or ‘scripture classes’ has any place in public schools anywhere in the country.

Tags: , , , ,

Ads that should meet a gruesome death

Sterben

Sterben

Tags: , ,

Silly old buggers

When I was 14 years old I could read, write, count way past 10 without using my fingers, wipe my own arse, dress myself, bathe myself and conduct a conversation quite often using words of more than 2 or 3 syllables.

Isn’t that remarkable?

I must’ve been gifted.

Henry Robinson is (allegedly) 14 years old. Henry had a Heckler column published in the Sydney Morning Herald today venting his bewilderment at the popularity of Justin Bieber (Henry’s not alone there), and in that column he used some VERY BIG words.

Many of the comments appended to the column express doubt that any 14 year old could possibly compose such a brief essay using such language because as we all know, the human brain is not fully developed until a person is 24 or 25 years old, and anyone under that age is simply a raving fuckwit.

Take 16 year old Jessica Watson, for example. Here she is, tootling about the bloody oceans of the world on a boat all by herself, completely buggering up her life, when, given that 16 is the new 6 in this angst ridden age of perpetual moral panic and hysterical obsession over the tender minds of this generation’s bubble-wrapped babes, she really ought to be at home playing with Barbie dolls and diligently working her way through the complete series of Dora the Explorer on DVD instead.

Now, Steve Fielding’s over 25 years old and dumber than a box of fucking hair, so I think this whole theory about young teens being a little dense and underdeveloped and incapable of formulating a rational thought is as hoary an old lump of bollocks as there ever was.

So, in response to this rubbish that’s forever being flung about, constantly attempting to perpetuate the myth that the young folk of today are all, without exception, as inarticulate and thick as Corey whatshisfuckingname???theonewiththeyellowsunglasses???, my 51 year old self has only 7 words to say …

Just fuck off, you silly old cunts.

Tags: ,

A Breef History of Australia by Christopher Abbott, Year 8

Captain Cook was a noble Englishman who discovered Australia in 1770, and a bit later another noble Englishman called Phillip put a colony here which was made of British people who were sent here because they had pinched some bread and stuff.

When Mr. Cook came here, there were boongs coons niggers Abo’s here who ate their babies and threw spears at him. Also, they ran around without any clothes on which is not right, that’s what pedo’s do.

So when the British people all got here, they killed the pedo boongs coons niggers blacks and told them to stop eating their babies, they should eat a pie instead.

After we became a country we went to some wars, and our greatest acheivment ever was fighting at Gallopy, where we would have won if it weren’t for a bunch of wogs who shot at us.

Then we went to another war, and we won that one because the wogs were dumber and we were smarter.

We didn’t do very well in Viettnam, but that was only because of the chinks.

Our great hereoes are Robert Menzies who was a Prime Minister ages ago, John Howard who was Prime Minister forever, Don Bradman who was very good at cricket, Kerry Packer gave us colour television and Rupert Murdoch who made “Avatar” which is fucking AWESOME X 1,000!!! thohgh my little brother got sick in the Hoyts from all the 3D and threw up over an old lady.

My Dad told me that our country is fucked buggered not going too well actually these days because of all the wogs and chinks we’ve let in. When all the lebo’s were raping Aussie women in Cronulla beach, my Dad went down there and told me that he punched a lebo in the face really hard and blood came out and the lebo ran away. We had pizza that night and Dad let me have a beer which was nice.

Dad told me that once we had a policy to keep all the wogs out, but some communists got rid of that and said we should hug queers and let women kill their babies which is against God who said queers should be put to death.

Anyway, the teacher told me I had to do at least one qwarto page for this essay and now I am at the end, so that’s all I can do about Australian history for now, also Mum is yelling at me to get my fucking arse out to the kitchen because dinner is ready.

On Tuesdays we get Chinese food from Lings, and Mum lets me have some wine from her cask which is nice (fruity lexia it is called).

I really like the mongrel lamb and spring rolls a lot, with the pink sauce.

Tags: