Archive for April, 2010

Justice system fails prisoner

Yesterday a prisoner was killed by a fellow inmate in a Victorian prison.

While there is little doubt that this particular prisoner was a very bad (very bad) person, a murder of a person while under the watch of the state is not something that should be taken lightly and it should never happen. “He had it coming” does not make it okay, it is not an excuse. As a society we decided long ago that capital punishment degrades us as a society and is not effective as a deterrent or punishment for crime.

But I digress.

My point is, can we please STFU about it now please?

The Nine Network has interrupted regular programming to bring me a special on ‘The Baby Faced Killer’. And I bet writers are already being commissioned to hack together the next season of Underbelly (Underbelly: a tale of 1/2 an exercise bike).

And there there are the newspaper websites:

The Age

The Age

Herald Sun

Herald Sun

I can’t wait for this voyeuristic journalisic crap to continue on the paper versions of the newspapers for the rest of the week.

Bring on the fucking paywall!

Tags: , ,

“I agree”

In the modern digital world, at least once every day I will tick a box stating that “I have read and agree to the terms and conditions”.

I rarely read them, I don’t care enough.

I would regularly joke with my friends that a thousand software manufactures could own my soul by now and I’d have no idea.

We all thought it was hilarious.

Yeah, well… They do.

A COMPUTER game retailer has revealed that it legally owns the souls of thousands of online shoppers, thanks to a clause in the terms and conditions they agreed to.

See, apparently this computer game retailer, GameStation, had the initiative to install what they called an “immortal soul clause” in their contract.

“By placing an order via this Web site on the first day of the fourth month of the year 2010 Anno Domini, you agree to grant Us a non transferable option to claim, for now and for ever more, your immortal soul. Should We wish to exercise this option, you agree to surrender your immortal soul, and any claim you may have on it, within 5 (five) working days of receiving written notification from gamesation.co.uk (sic) or one of its duly authorised minions.”

It allowed them to claim your soul at any time the desired, they even reserved the right “to serve such notice in 6 (six) foot high letters of fire”.

I, for one, welcome the precedent set by this new form of legal contract and am excited by the possibilities it has opened. I look forward to other inovative organizations adopting the initiative in their binding contracts.

I have made my online life easier by giving Google control of everything, imagine how streamlined my life could be if I just gave them control over my soul too (but you know, it’s only a technicality, it’s not like they’d never *do* anything with it, right?).

We all know Apple already owns every pathetic Mac-fan-boy-who-lined-up-for-an-iPad-for-days-and-wants-Steve-Jobs-for-his-body’s soul, so why not make it official in a binding contract? In exchange for their soul they could get Apple bumper stickers.

This is just the beginning of course, the potential is limitless. TV networks, newspapers (perhaps Rupert would accept payment of eternal souls to populate his city of the damned in lieu of cash to get past his paywall. It would certainly save him some hassle when it comes to finding breakfast), political parties and NGOs. This is the dawn of an exciting new day in End User License Agreements.

Tags: , , ,

The Christine Nixon defence rests

There was an excellent piece in Fairfax’s The National Times by Kathy Stewart, a Kinglake woman who lost her home and many friends on Black Saturday. In her article, headed “Mudslide of blame buries the real issues”, Stewart points out that Bushfires Royal Commission is ”now in danger of delivering so little in real terms because it has been hijacked by those intent on finding a scapegoat”.

She goes on to say what an excellent job Christine Nixon has done as head of the Bushfire Reconstruction Authority and how counter productive caving in to her old enemies and sacking her would be.

The comments that followed were generally in agreement with Stewart, but there was one in particular that I found very interesting and sums up why, despite being commissioner of police at the time of the disaster, Christine Nixon’s presence was not as essential to the emergency effort as her detractors are making out.  

John, of Sydney writes:

I have said this on an earlier blog and I will say it again. I am an retired NSW Police Emergency Services Operator. I have a very great deal of experience in working in Emergency Rooms during all kinds of natural and man made disasters. Most of the criticism of Nixon comes from very ill informed people. I have seen such foolish comments as “provide leadership” or “take command”. People who make these remarks have been watching too much American TV. The people who work in Emergency Operations Centres during disasters are far to busy to care whether the Commissioner is present or not and far to professional to need leadership provided.

As for the Commissioner “taking command” that would be a very loud declaration of her lack of confidence in her Senior Operational Commanders and completely unacceptable. So what are we left with for the Commissioner to do? Well with all due respect to Police Commissioners everywhere the answer is … nothing. A Police Commissioner in an Emergency Room is, to use an old Australian saying “as useless as tits on a bull”. Their role is to summarise the situation to the Government and its Ministers and to fly the flag after the event. Now this may not suit people who live in some sort of a fantasy American sitcom but it is the truth nonetheless.

So Nixon went to dinner on the night of the bush fires? So what? She had a mobile phone with her and could if necessary be appraised of the situation that way. The fact that she wasnt rang means there was at that stage nothing to tell her. This whole thing is a disgusting witch hunt by people who want to take the spotlight of themselves.

As I have previously written at Groupthink, it really is time the Bushfires Royal Commission started looking at how another Black Saturday can be avoided, rather than letting a pack of rabid lawyers loose on convenient scapegoats.

 

Tags: ,

Scoring points from death

I started reading a Liberal Party press release this afternoon, impressed that the party machinery would comment so quickly on an international tragedy of which most Australians are probably unaware:

The Coalition is concerned by reports of a severe tropical storm that has devastated parts of India and Bangladesh.

Reports that more than 100 people have been killed and more than 100,000 homes destroyed indicate the severity of the storm, which will cause severe hardship for the people in the region.

The Coalition extends its sympathy to those affected by the storm and to any Australians with family or friends in the area affected by the storm.

Wow. Top stuff, Libs. But then I made the mistake of reading the next paragraph:

The Opposition urges the Rudd Government to offer its support and to provide any necessary assistance to family members living in Australia who have relatives in the storm zone.

Never let an opportunity pass to take a swipe at the government, even if that opportunity presents itself in the form of death and destruction; get in first with the compassion so you can implicitly charge the others with having less. Stay classy, Libs.

Tags: ,

Art schmart

What would our city be without public art to stimulate the masses?

According to Lord Mayor Robert Doyle, “the city would be a ‘joyless’ place without provocative art to stimulate the public mind.”

Under normal circumstances Molesworth would agree, but Molesworth fails to see how Melbourne’s latest piece of public art is supposed to bring us joy.

From The Age:

The artwork, titled Red Fragments, includes red painted panels with inscriptions including “blood from a dead baby in the Congo” and “blood from a dead teenager decapitated by neo-Nazis”.

It also bears plaques representing blood from a dog starved to death in a gallery in Honduras, blood from a dead baby seal clubbed in Greenland, blood from a woman flogged and stoned in Iran and blood from a dead elephant shot by ivory hunters in Kenya.

What does Doyle think we are? A city full of emos?

emo

Molesworth can feel the love already.

What do you think the role of public art should be?

Tags: , ,

Cameron’s battlers

Battersea Power Station has been featured many times in music, film, television and even election launches over its 70 year history. Pink Floyd used it on the cover of their 1977 album Animals, Hitchcock used it as his opening shot for his 1936 film Sabotage and Margaret Thatcher used it (to fire a laser) and then announced that it would be demolished and turned into a theme park.

Thatcher and her developers demolished the roof and most of the walls nearly destroying it. I was lucky enough to be allowed inside in 2008 during an open day which showcased a community redevelopment of the station, restoring it and developing the surrounding area into housing, shops and parks.

The author re-launching a music device

The author re-launching a music device

As Anthony Painter points out:

On 6th June 1988 PM Margaret Thatcher fired a laser gun to signal the start of the John Broome theme park which he claimed would be opened on May 21st 1990 at 2:30pm. The site is still derelict over 20 years later.

Yesterday Tory leader, David Cameron, launched his Tory Party Manifesto at Battersea Power Station. I’m not quite sure the symbolism he is going for here. Many remarked via Twitter the irony of the launch being outside a “…hollowed out, crumbling relic”. But was Cameron using Battersea as a metaphor for New Labor?

I’m guessing he hopes people have short memories. Those who grew up in Thatcher’s Britain on the underside of the economic divide would see the irony – Thatcher used it as a metaphor to symbolise the misery of the underclass blaming union-controlled workforce and past socialist governments. Thatcher promised to turn Battersea and their lives into a wonderful theme park. “A fanfare of hype and superficial hope”.

Just like Howard won over his battlers by handing out cash like a drunken socialist, Cameron may be trying to re-brand himself using socialist imagery and spider pigs.

Tags: , , , ,

Well that settles it, Nixon has to go!

I’m not comfortable with newspapers making demands of government. I like the idea of an objective press which reports on issues rather than try influence them. Sure there are exceptions, such as campaigns to cut the road toll but that’s more about education than bully boy tactics.

After further testimony to the Bushfires Royal Commission that shattered any credibility that former Victoria Police Commissioner Christine Nixon had left, the Herald Sun website ran an editorial demanding the Victorian Government sack her from her role heading the Bushfire Recovery Authority (though it fails to mention the role it wants her sacked from).

The editorial, titled “10 reasons why we say Christine Nixon should be sacked” makes some valid points, such as:

2 She went to dinner minutes after being told of at least 14 lives being lost.

4 She did not get updates about the unfolding disaster for the three hours between 6pm and 9pm.

But it’s point No. 10 that should make John Brumby change his mind and sack Christine Nixon on the spot:

10 About 70 per cent of Herald Sun online readers say she must go

I shit you not.

Tags: , , ,

Straight to the back of the queue

Tough Samaritan* Steve Fielding is still determined to send “boat people” to the “back of the queue”.

Been getting lots of support from ppl in the street in Sale for sending boat people to the back of the queue.

Personally, I’m not sure that seeking asylum by boat is a back-of-the-queueing offence; I think people should be sent to the back of the queue when they take too long to get their money out of their purses, or when they take ages making up their minds what to buy, or when they just want to have a chat to the cashier.

But that’s just me. What in your opinion justifies sending to the back of the queue?

* H/T: Jason

Tags: , ,

Compare and contrast

Andrew Bolt is a conservative, not a right-winger:

MTR, [Steve Price] said, would be Right-wing.

[I reminded] Price that if I had to own a tag, it was “conservative”, a very different thing.

And conservatives, unlike left- and right-wingers, unite people:

… conservatives of my kind also know it’s through our reason, freedom and individualism that we’re most fully human … We mistrust all creeds that divide us into tribes …

Here is Andrew Bolt not dividing us into tribes:

What a world we are literally creating. Two centuries ago in Britain, the rich outbred the poor, and pushed their values down the social scale. Now the poor – many virtuous, yes, but others lazy, careless or unsocialised – outbreed the rich, and the mob’s values are pushed up.

Clearly, under conservatism things like freedom and individualism only go so far. Opera: okay; tattoos and low socio-economic status: “new barbarianism”.

Tags: , ,

Graph

Thanks for voting in our poll.

Tags: