I reproduce this Citizens Electoral Council press release that lobbed into my inbox this arvo (I subscribe to a lot of shit, okay?) without comment.
Citizens Electoral Council of Australia
Media Release 1st of December 2009Queen flexes muscle to demand Copenhagen genocide treaty
Just as the climate change hoax is about to derail completely, Her Britannic Majesty herself, Queen Elizabeth II, whose family spawned the modern green genocide movement*, has pulled rank on the Commonwealth group of nations—her repackaged “Empah”—to demand they deliver a treaty at Copenhagen.
*(Royal Consort HRH the Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Philip, founded the World Wide Fund for Nature [WWF] in 1961, as a charity vehicle for his fellow European aristocrats and their corporations to finance green movements around the world to stop economic development and reduce human population.)The Queen’s extraordinary intervention smacks of real desperation—she knows her family’s long-term survival as modern feudal monarchs depends on her carefully-cultivated image as a powerless, quaint figurehead, so the stakes must be high for her to feel the need to flex her considerable muscle, which is derived from her royal “Prerogative Powers”, which include the powers:
- to declare war;
- choose and appoint all commanders and officers by land, sea, and air;
- convoke, adjourn, remove, and dissolve parliament;
- dismiss the prime minister and choose whom she will as the replacement;
- choose and appoint all judges, councillors, officers of state, magistrates;
- bestow all public honours, including creating a peerage for membership of the House of Lords or bestowing an order of chivalry;
- conclude treaties;
- initiate criminal proceedings, and bestow pardons;
- and many others, which she has shown in the past she is willing to use, notably when she sacked the Whitlam government in 1975, whose “buy back the farm” policies were a threat to her own control of Australia’s raw materials wealth exercised through her ownership of Rio Tinto.
For the British imperialists, what is at stake if the global warming fraud fails, is the continuity of empire itself, in the form of globalisation. To survive in the face of the global economic collapse, nations are reasserting their national sovereignty, backing away from the free trade and deregulated finance policies that are the cornerstones of British imperialism.
(In a world of total free trade, freed from government regulations and protections, it is money which dictates terms, not governments, and that money is directed from the City of London—that is the British Empire. When nations reassert their sovereign laws to exert national controls over money, the City of London—the Empire—is defeated.)
“Climate change” promised to be the mechanism to both further globalisation, in the form of binding international treaties, global government institutions, and a new financial architecture centred on carbon emissions trading, as well as to deliver on the Prince Philip-led goal of human population reduction, by denying nations the right to develop high-density energy sources and high-technology primary and secondary industries, thus condemning them to poverty, squalor and mass death.
In the countdown to Copenhagen, that plan derailed: China and India refused to bow to the treaty’s demands to slash agriculture (China, India, South Africa and Brazil issued a joint declaration in Beijing on 27th November, promising to walk out of Copenhagen to protect their national interests); hackers or whistleblowers exposed the actually deliberate scientific fraud by the world’s leading so-called climate scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU); and in Australia, which under British agent Kevin Rudd was appointed to take the lead on global action on climate change, the parliament deadlocked, and was unable to pass the key climate change legislation, the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which Rudd was hoping to parade as “action” at Copenhagen.
This is the context in which the Queen herself has intervened, but a revolution is underway: instead of the usual grovelling acquiescence she’d expect, aside from the biggest nation in her Commonwealth, India, lining up against her (see above), her ordinarily very loyal Opposition in Australia has shifted under intense public pressure, and dumped the climate change believer Malcolm Turnbull as leader, for avowed sceptic Tony Abbott, to stymie the ETS bill altogether.
Um, yep.

#1 by Gnoll110 on 1 December 2009 - 9:03 pm
Quote
These guys related to the LaRouchian fruitcake collective?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_LaRouche
#2 by Topher on 2 December 2009 - 7:23 am
Quote
I got one of those too.
I remember getting their newspaper delivered (as junk mail). It was the funniest thing I’ve ever seen.
#3 by couchy on 2 December 2009 - 11:08 am
Quote
Don’t you hate it when tucked in among the monkey-flung faeces are one or two sentences that you actually agree with
“In a world of total free trade, freed from government regulations and protections, it is money which dictates terms, not governments” and “When nations reassert their sovereign laws to exert national controls over money, the City of London—the Empire—is defeated”
(Ok, the City of London / Empire part is still silly but the vibe is right)
And the thought of British Agent Kevin Rudd – Rudd, Kevin Rudd – is too too funny.
#4 by Molesworth on 2 December 2009 - 1:03 pm
Quote
@ Gnoll110 – Yes they are.
#5 by Ross Sharp on 2 December 2009 - 2:16 pm
Quote
Also, the British Royals once captured a race of aliens and killed them all in a volcano and then they put all their alien spoof into the water supply and made us all into communists.
That’s where the black helicopters come from. Commie alien spoof.
#6 by @ndy on 3 December 2009 - 2:38 am
Quote
Ross’s attempts to deflect attention away from the role of The Bilderberg Group in poisoning our water supply with the dangerous chemical known as fluoride is as transparent as it is pathetic. The CEC — which presumably employs “Ross” to peddle these stories — is a front group for The Gnomes of Zurich (hence the constant and equally false references to The Royal Family of London).
Read The Protocols of the Elders of Glasgow if you don’t believe me.
#7 by stewie on 3 December 2009 - 10:17 am
Quote
Protocols of the Elders of Glasgow? Is that the one with whisky, bagpipes and haggis used as homeopathic agents in water supplies for mind control of the population?
#8 by Ross Sharp on 3 December 2009 - 1:15 pm
Quote
The Bilderberg Group are a bunch of nancy wannabes.
Fluoride is not a chemical. It’s alien spoof.
#9 by @ndy on 3 December 2009 - 2:06 pm
Quote
Again with the lies!
Nancy Wannabe is NOT involved with The Bilderberg Group; she is one of their most outspoken critics. Hence her re-publication in the 1930s of the seminal nineteenth century expose ‘The Protocols’. And yes: at the time of its original dissemination, ‘The Protocols’ received ‘The Official Seal of Approval’ from The Society for ‘The Study and Promotion of Homeopathy’ of Aberdeen.
Haggis is banned in the US, but The Royal Family can visit any time that they please.
Why is The Left silent about this?
#10 by bbp on 3 December 2009 - 2:43 pm
Quote
“intense public pressure”??? shouldn’t that read “intense public disinterest”?
#11 by Ross Sharp on 3 December 2009 - 3:56 pm
Quote
Nancy Wannabe couldn’t bake a Haggis to save herself, and The Gnomes of Zurich are a bunch of garden fairies.
And using the words “dissemination” and “homeopathy” in the same sentence is obscene. We all know homeopaths want to marry their dogs and put their poisonous spoof in our food. Prince Charles told them to do that, “Put your poisonous spoof in their food and make like a tampon and live in your pants”, he said.
And who makes tampons?
That’s right.
Now you know, buddy.
#12 by @ndy on 3 December 2009 - 5:09 pm
Quote
What I know, “buddy”, could fill a book. But it wouldn’t be published. Why? Because The Gnomes of Zurich, in close collaboration with Freemasons LIKE ROSS, wouldn’t allow it.
Yes.
That’s right.
Ross is a Boss: a Freemason.
They are terrified of words like ‘dissemination’, ‘homeopathy’, ‘Nancy’ and ‘Wannabe’. THIS is why they support CENSORSHIP! This is why they support GROUPTHINK!
You wanna talk about OBSCENITY?
OBSCENITY is when serious discussion about Gnomes and Freemasons is suppressed by agents of The Bilderberg Group masquerading as critics of the CEC. Hence the ridiculous claims that flouride emanates from alien orifices, and the propagation of scurrilous rumours concerning the relationship between homeopaths and their dogs NONE OF WHICH HAVE BEEN PROVEN IN COURT.
If this is the kind of public discourse Groupthink is going to encourage, I shall depart to a more serious forum.