I won’t pretend to be on top of the detail when it comes to AGW. But let’s assume, for the sake of argument, that it is a real problem.
Does anybody seriously believe that the ETS, a market solution, par excellence, is going to make the slightest bit of difference? That in placing all of our eggs into the capitalist basket, we are trusting in a magic talisman that can, at best, merely tinker on the margins?
Using capitalist structures and processes as a means of combating AGW is like trying to fight a live bushfire by opening up a a farmers’ market, and putting a tax on undergrowth.
And this at a time when support for ‘the market’ has never been lower.

team@groupthink.com.au

#1 by Mr Pastry on 18 November 2009 - 10:54 am
Quote
I originally thought ETS was more than one freindly alien.
I have since found out it is a government department “to save the world” and with the clever use of Forms with tick boxes, the planet will no longer get warmer (as long as it does not happen during the long service leaves). All the form fillers, I am sure, will fill them in honestly just like we do with tax returns. Of course there will be other ETS winners apart from the planet with the biggest benificiaries being ETS lawyers (Penny Wong is a Lawyer and must be preparing career plan B). So its back to V8s, bar fridges, air conditioning, large screen tvs and anything else we can consume and spit out and shit on because public servants have sorted it all out.
#2 by jules on 18 November 2009 - 4:50 pm
Quote
Nobody I know seriously believes the ETS will make a scrap off difference.
#3 by stace on 18 November 2009 - 7:36 pm
Quote
AGW? ETS? OMG! LOL!
#4 by Trevor McDonald on 20 November 2009 - 9:05 am
Quote
I would like to offer you a correction to this post. The word is “Taxman” not “Talisman”. That word does not exist.
#5 by jules on 20 November 2009 - 12:36 pm
Quote
Nice one Trev.