“Bugger the Good Samaritan”, said the man, who wishes to remain anonymous for obvious reasons.
“There it was, in 50’s and 20’s, in a plain bag, no identification, no sign of where or who it may have come from. I found it on the way to work, called in sick, and took it home.”
What was the first thing that crossed your mind after finding it, we asked the man, whom we shall call Ross Sharp*, “My first thoughts were, I owe a few grand on the credit card, I’ve got a personal loan with about 6 months left to run, and I need a new lounge suite. The one I got I picked up from Vinnie’s for two hundred bucks about five years ago. I’m keeping this cash.”
Mr. Sharp continued, “I compared the notes to a couple I had in my wallet with a magnifying glass just to make sure there was nothing dodgy about it, if it was marked or counterfeit. It looked fine. I checked about a hundred notes. They weren’t consecutive serial numbers either, so that was good. I realised if I shoved a hundred grand into my bank account that it would probably draw a bit of attention, especially from the A.T.O., so I decided to do what all good legitimate businessmen and property developers do when they’re laundering drug profits and run it through a casino**”.
“I figured I could run ten grand a month through the tables and accept a loss of twenty cents on the dollar. I’d take the eight to the cashier and get them to write a cheque for it, and take that to my bank.”***
“I did that for 6 months. There was one month, I actually fucking won. I took ten grand, and won six. Fucking brilliant!”, Mr. Sharp continued. “And I didn’t run it all through, I bought a few things with the cash. The new lounge suite? It’s a three-piece, hand-tooled red leather, they wanted two thousand eight for it, for cash I beat them down to two thousand two.”
We asked Mr. Sharp if he felt any guilt about keeping the money.
“Are you fucking kidding me? Look, if someone’s dumb enough to lose a hundred grand, I’m not going to be dumb enough to hand it in. You can shove all this “what if” moralising claptrap. I’m not going to pretend I’m some upstanding, holier-than-thou, philanthropic sunbeam for Jesus, some honest-to-goodness legit national hero, like a Richard Pratt. I caught a break and I ran with it.”
Where to from here, Mr. Sharp?
“Well, I don’t have any debt anymore which feels fucking fantastic, I can tell you. I’ve got a flat full of nice new furniture, I bought a small car, and next year I’m taking a trip to the United States. I’ve always wanted to go. I’m a big fan of “The Wire”, so I’m going to spend a couple days in Baltimore, the nice parts.”
Thank you, Mr. Sharp.
“That money changed my life. I’m fucking stoked. Everything came up roses for once!”
*Not his actual name. No relation to this reporter.
**This reporter is not suggesting legitimate business figures and property developers launder proceeds from drug importation and sales through casinos.
***Would this work? Please let this reporter know. I’ve never gambled at a casino.

#1 by Jeremy on 7 November 2009 - 9:09 am
Quote
That would be a terrible story if it were true.
#2 by Trevor McDonald on 7 November 2009 - 10:47 am
Quote
I’m still waiting for my 100,000 from Philip Adams for discovering the crop circles.
#3 by cNm on 7 November 2009 - 11:59 am
Quote
Dear Mr. Sharp,
Regarding your “***” query; while laundering money through a casino would work, your namesake might do better to loiter at racetracks and TAB’s.
Perhaps wearing a three-piece, hand-tooled red leather lounge suit, refashioned from his three-piece, hand-tooled red leather lounge suite, he could ostentatiously fan wads of cash, drawing the attention of punters holding winning tickets. He then offers the lucky punters 110% of the winning tickets’ value in cash.
Very many winning punters will happily take your namesake up on his offer, delighted with the additional payout and thrilled to be disencumbered of requirement to collect their winnings. Your namesake should then assemble the winning tickets in an empty shoebox and take the package to the nearest TAB, which will issue a cheque equivalent to the total value of the winning tickets.
While this method precludes the possibility of an unexpected casino win, it is a more reliable and, in all likelihood, a cheaper-in-the-long-run money laundering method.
Also, the money is shared with “ordinary Australians” rather than the nauseating businesses which operate casinos and your namesake will have the opportunity to get “out and about” instead of breathing the fetid putrid air circulating in your typical casino.
#4 by reb on 7 November 2009 - 3:00 pm
Quote
Why do I get the feeling that cNm has more than just a passing theoretical knowledge of how to launder a hundred grand?
#5 by Mr Pastry on 7 November 2009 - 4:13 pm
Quote
I have often pondered the use of casinos – now I know it is the supermarket of money laundering for the common man. You were willing to let the casino have 20% of the dodgy cash sober, so I think it is fair to assume 80% of all money gambled at casinos is ill gotten, making these establishments very popular criminal gang members. This should not have been necessary for Mr Sharp as I am sure “finders keeps losers weepers” is on the staute books.
#6 by John Surname on 7 November 2009 - 4:22 pm
Quote
Jeremy says:
I dub thee:
#7 by John Surname on 7 November 2009 - 4:23 pm
Quote
Hmm the pic showed up in preview.
Here is is: http://i35.tinypic.com/33emqhg.jpg
#8 by stace on 7 November 2009 - 7:26 pm
Quote
Ross Ross Ross Ross Ross…I’m really not sure about the red leather lounge suit. I’m seeing Nick Scali. And black satin sheets. Was that the look you were after?
I’ll take you shopping if you like. I’m good with furniture.
#9 by Jeremy on 7 November 2009 - 8:45 pm
Quote
Glad to hear it, John. Glad that is obvious.
#10 by Scott Bridges on 8 November 2009 - 12:32 pm
Quote
If John and Jeremy don’t stop it I’m going to turn this blog around and go home.
#11 by Ross Sharp on 9 November 2009 - 10:46 am
Quote
I know the type of red you’re thinking of, Stace, but it’s not that. It’s more blood red, and not Nick Scali red.
It’s sort of red, but not red.
#12 by Dave Gaukroger on 9 November 2009 - 7:28 pm
Quote
Wouldn’t you just put chunks of it in the nearest pokie, play ten spins and cash out?
#13 by jules on 18 November 2009 - 1:00 am
Quote
Nah, pokies are regulated(ie constant payout rates 855 of total input over time I think), monitered and big payouts get written down. If you try to cash out large amounts of money eventually it will show up on the pokies … balance sheet. Also when they give you big payouts (ie call attendant payouts) do they check something in the machine to see if its recorded a big win?
I know they write some stuff down in my local.
Maybe you could do 10 gran at 10 pokies in different venues in a major city over a day. That probably would work. But I really dunno cos I don’t play pokies that often.
Plus you are probably gonna get the cash in cheques, and depositing a series of big checks from pokies over a short time will look sus.
I spose its a one off thing so you mightn’t set up one of those red flag things banks set off when you mess around with too much cash, but honestly I dunno, if you had to cash a series of large checks from pokies over a small time.
Using a racetrack as a laundry has some serious security issues.
You don’t want someone noticing what you are doing and then cottoning on and thinking that perhaps carrying all that money home might be bad for your back, and maybe they could do it for you.
The casino is the best bet I reckon, provided they have good security between the front door and your car.